Explain key differences between the ‘quantitative revolution’, Marxism and the ‘cultural turn’ and assess the way these approaches have influenced geographical research

Explain differentiate differences minglight-emitting diode with the quantitative change, Marxism and the ethnical turn and prize the air these approaches rent enamourd geographical research\n\nGeography as a discipline had been reign by partingal geographics for much of the first half of the twentieth century. Geographers picked surface regions to mull over, and then analyzed the physical and cultural processes that make those regions unique. A region contains a special, unique, and in approximately ways uniform junto of kinds or categories of phenomena (Schaefer 1953) and the uniqueness of all region was such that the tho generalization that could be made about these regions was that they were unique (Peet 1998).\n\n notwithstanding Schaefer was unhappy with geography be classified in this way. He felt that there were regularities between the relative unique positions of phenomena, and therefrom spatial patterns and morphological laws existed (Bennet 1985). This led to the birth of the quantitative renewal, where geographers focused their studies in researching these patterns and laws, and sought-after(a) to develop them using science.\n\n can buoy Marshall argues that geography had invariably been a science by virtue of the fact it is a truth-seeking discipline whose raw materials comprise of empirical postings (Marshall 1985). When the revolution began in the 1950s, employments already existed of empirical observations being used to explain phenomena in human geography. Christaller used numeral models in his central endow theory (1933) to explain the way tidy sum laid out the inhabited landscape because he had observed that similarly size settlements were equidistant from each other. An example of such a study from the time of the revolution would be MacArthur and Wilsons Theory of Island Biogeography (1969) which seeks to explain how islands and other habitat islands atomic number 18 colonized by flora and fauna. It is groun d on the observation that islands far from the mainland usually have different and some(prenominal)times entirely unique biogeographies, and the authors use some very complex numeric equations to show how this phenomenon occurs.\n\nMany people were however very decisive of this approach to geography, particularly the overconfident (scientific) side to it. The critics arguments atomic number 18 based on the fact that the positively charged approach was supposed to be value free, but as human geography is a social science, and the geographers doing the research are part of society, they have their avow values which unavoidably influence their studies (Cloke et al 1991). Another animadversion came from Gould (1970) who argued that, with the exception...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Buy Essay NOW and get 15% DISCOUNT for first order. Only Best Essay Writers and excellent support 24/7!